California's ambitious climate change policies need to take into account not just the need for
and impact on energy production and ensuring the water supply, but how the two issues relate to one
another. Energy and water related policies are highly complex issues that are inextricably
intertwined, and need to be examined in concert, rather than separately, according to a nationwide
team of research laboratories.
"Energy-water linkages are critical elements of economic and environmental systems," said Robin
Newmark, Deputy Program Director for Energy and Environmental Security at Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory. "Most people understand that population and economic growth impact both energy
production and water consumption. But the connections between the two are not always apparent.
Energy production involves significant quantities of cooling water; moreover, energy is needed for
water conveyance, storage, and treatment. We should not examine these systems in isolation."
A consortium of 12 national laboratories and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), the
Energy-Water Nexus, is seeking to develop support for a national energy-water security plan.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, as much freshwater is withdrawn for producing
electricity as for agricultural irrigation, and DOE statistics show that Americans use as much
energy for water and wastewater as other major sectors of the economy. The problem is, no single
agency has overall programmatic responsibility for water impacts on energy policy and energy used by
water systems; these interdependencies represent a critical piece of the management puzzle.
Climate change concerns exacerbate the issue in several ways. The production of greenhouse gases
as a component of energy production has been a major focus for California policymakers recently.
However, while California has been a national leader in setting strict emissions standards, there
are already infrastructure ramifications to cope with as a result of climate change that has already
occurred. In January of this year, a Livermore research team at the Program for Climate Model
Diagnosis and Intercomparison, in collaboration with Scripps Institution of Oceanography, pinpointed
human-generated climate change as the cause of diminishing water flow in the western United States.
By looking at air temperatures, river flow and snowpack over the last 50 years, the team determined
that the human-induced increase in greenhouse gases has seriously affected the water supply in the
West, with strong implications for water management.
These problems are not limited to California, and the Energy-Water Nexus team is in fact focusing
on the Department of Energy, which already has some programs addressing water use in electricity
generation. However, there is room for analysis and action at the state level as well as the
national level. For example, Lawrence Livermore is conducting an investigation of climate change
impacts on weather-dependent renewable energy generation (wind, solar and hydropower) for the
California Energy Commission.
"Understanding the interdependencies between these systems is important to those involved in
water and energy infrastructure planning and management," said Newmark. "Water is an energy issue,
and ensuring our water and energy supply will require long-term, multidisciplinary planning if
California is to complete its energy sustainability puzzle."